miniZAP® in Performance Comparison


Common zapper devices only render a variable or constant output voltage, where there is no constant current flowing through the body, because current depends on skin resistance, which, in return, alternates due to internal and external influences (diagram 1, Hautwiderstand = resistance, Zeit = time).

Diagram 1

Diagram 2

Therefore there is no consistent maintanance of the user set current. The miniZAP® keeps current constant, during each application, independend of skin resistance. Diagram 2 (Stromstärke = currenct, Zeit = time) shows the comparison of the currenct curve between miniZAP® (blue) and zappers without constant current control (red).

miniZAP® (blue): The level of currenct stays constant during the complete application, which guarantees maximum effect.

Without CCC (red): The currenct undergoes strong alterations, which doesn’t assure constant efficiency of the current therapy.

Note: At a continuous current of 400 µA and a  3V battery with 235 mAh, the miniZAP® lasts longer than a conventional Beck zapper with a 9V block (400 mAh).This is because conventional zapper circuits consume the larger part of the curent internally (heat production), instead of leading it through the body.

The miniZAP® SMD layer with meanwhile far over 100 parts and RISC-µ-processor achieves in comparison with all known Zapper devices the highest integration.

Case lid, above interior with LCD display, top right 3V button cell.

Back side of the board, top right LCD microprocessor

Are you interested or would you like further information about miniZAP®?